The table of intertype relationships between Augustinavichyute and Lyashkavicius is a visual representation of the relationship of different psychotypes with each other. With its help, you can easily determine which dominant qualities of one personality will suppress the qualities of another. Below will be presented for your consideration a table of intertype relationships and a brief decoding of each psychotype with explanations to the table.
Personalities
To use the table of intertype relationships, you first need to determine your psychotype and the psychotype of your partner, that is, to carry out typing. To do this, you can take the test yourself. Books on social science offer many such questionnaires. If you have a little extra time and desire, then the best choice would be to address this question to a qualified specialist in socionics.
Table of intertype relationships in socionics
Use the table to compare your psychotype with the psychotype of your partner. The cell at the intersection of your types and isresult.
Types of intertype relationships according to the table
So, let's try to decipher the table.
Identity (identity)
If your psychotypes coincide with a person, then it is likely that interests will also coincide, as well as values and outlook on life. This kind of relationship is considered successful and favorable for both parties.
Duality (dual)
In this type of relationship, one partner completely complements the other. The strengths of each compensate for all the weaknesses of the other, so this is very good for interacting with each other.
Activation (act)
This relationship is perfect for pleasant meetings and a comfortable, but short, pastime. Ease of communication and interaction with each other is the main feeling that can be used to describe activation. But for long-term relationships, this type of relationship is not well suited.
Mirror (mirror)
In such a relationship, partners will most likely have a lot of similarities, so this type is also considered favorable for human interaction.
Relatives (genus)
Psychotypes in such respects are similar, but nevertheless have significant differences, which are expressed in a certain approach to business. Unfavorable for building a family.
Semi-duality (PD)
Interest between the parties is always quite high, but when trying to get closer, problems often arise. For this reason, such relationships are best avoided.
Business (business)
In this kind of relationship, you will have a business contact with periodic competition between the parties. The constant struggle for the role of leader adversely affects the future of such relationships.
Mirage (world)
Relationships of this kind are considered the most favorable for building a family, as both parties feel comfortable and confident with each other. However, such interaction is not suitable for productive activities.
Superego (SE)
There is mutual respect between partners, but when the parties get closer, conflicts and misunderstandings can also arise. This type of relationship is not suitable for family life and building close bonds.
Quasi-identity (QT)
Favorable relations will be only if the common interests and life goals of both parties coincide.
The complete opposite (PP)
As everyone knows, opposites converge, and this case is no exception. Partners will complement each other's strengths and weaknesses, forming a strong alliance.
Conflict (conf)
In such a relationship, a tense atmosphere will be constantly maintained, which at any moment can turn into a conflict. It is highly discouraged to enter into such an interaction.
Customer (zak)
In such a relationship, one of the parties will be in constant submission to the other.
Inspector (roar)
One of the partners in such a relationship takes on the role of an educator (auditor), constantly pointing out the shortcomings of the other. SuchRelationships are highly discouraged for either living together or working.
Conclusion
We hope this table of intertype relationships has helped you draw some conclusions about the people around you.
It is important to understand that these are just scientific studies and do not always reflect the variety of real relationships between people.
